How Characteristics of Student Essays Influence Teachers' Evaluations

نویسنده

  • Sarah Warshauer Freedman
چکیده

This article explores the question of why competent evaluators award the ratings they do to college students' expository essays. Essays were rewritten to be stronger or weaker in four categories: content, organization, sentence structure, and mechanics. Twelve evaluators first used a 4-point holistic rating scale to judge the essays' quality. Then they rated whether each of the four rewriting categories in each rewritten essay was strong or weak (perceptions). Analyses of variance revealed content and organization to affect ratings most (p < .001). Mechanics and sentence structure had smaller effects, which differed when measured by the actual rewriting versus by the perceptions. Mechanics and sentence structure were significant in their interaction with organization (p < .001 andp < .01, respectively).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Discrimination Based on Gender and Prior Grades: Results from a Field Experiment

The grades that students receive in school have been used to determine important social outcomes like educational tracks, scholarships, and even wages. However, grades do not always accurately reflect student achievement. Studies show, for example, that teachers discriminate in grading based on students’ ascribed characteristics (such as race or caste). The literature is largely silent, however...

متن کامل

Finding the WRITE Stuff: Automatic Identification of Discourse Structure in Student Essays

automated feedback that helps them revise their work and ultimately improve their writing skills. These applications also address educational researchers’ interest in individualized instruction. Specifically, feedback that refers explicitly to students’own writing is more effective than general feedback.3 Our discourse analysis software, which is embedded in Criterion (www.etstechnologies.com),...

متن کامل

What Do Science Teachers Consider When Selecting Formative Assessment Tasks?

The purpose of this qualitative exploratory study was to identify factors that influenced prospective and experienced secondary level science teachers’ reasoning as they evaluated or selected tasks to formatively assess their students’ understanding of scientific concepts. The analysis of the coded written responses revealed two categories of factors that influenced the teachers’ reasoning: (1)...

متن کامل

Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships.

CONTEXT Narrative feedback documented in performance evaluations by the teacher, i.e. the clinical supervisor, is generally accepted to be essential for workplace learning. Many studies have examined factors of influence on the usage of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) instruments and provision of feedback, but little is known about how these factors influence teachers' feedback-giv...

متن کامل

PERCEPTIONS OF SUPERVISION PRACTICES BY AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION STUDENT TEACHERS Moreetsi Thobega, Lecturer Botswana College of Agriculture

The purpose of this study was to describe student teachers’ perceptions and preferences of the type of supervision they experienced while interacting with their university supervisors and cooperating teachers. Results revealed that student teachers perceived both their cooperating teachers and university supervisors to engage in contextual and clinical supervision practices. Cooperating teacher...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005